Experimental Design and the Scientific Method โ€” TEAS Science | Nurse.org
Menu

Science ยท Scientific investigation

Experimental Design and the Scientific Method

About 22 minutes with practiceNot marked readNot yet practiced

Estimated time includes reading and one quiz. Take the time you need.

Start here: key ideas

  • A hypothesis must be testable.
  • The independent variable is changed by the researcher.
  • The dependent variable is measured.
  • Controlled variables are kept the same.
  • A control group gives a comparison.
  • Replication and good sampling strengthen evidence.
What youโ€™ll be able to do
  • Write a testable hypothesis.
  • Identify independent, dependent, and controlled variables.
  • Explain why controls, sampling, and replication matter.
  • Tell validity from reliability.

Turn a question into a fair test by choosing variables, controls, samples, and repeated trials.

Optional review

If youโ€™d like to review the basics, visit Scientific Measurement, Units, and Tools. You can start this lesson without completing those first.

1 / 4

From question to testable prediction

Science starts with an answerable question. A hypothesis is a testable proposed explanation or prediction. It should connect a change to a measurable result.

Example: โ€œIf light time increases, then bean plants will grow taller over two weeks.โ€ This can be tested. โ€œPlants like lightโ€ is too vague because โ€œlikeโ€ is not clearly measurable.

A hypothesis must be able to be supported or rejected with evidence. It is not a final proven fact. A prediction states the expected result if the hypothesis is correct.

Scientific explanations are tested and revised

Scientific-process diagram connects observation, hypothesis, testing, and explanation.

Open full-size image โ†—

A hypothesis is an explanation you can test. A prediction says what you expect to observe. Results may support the explanation or show it needs changing. One successful test does not prove it is always true. A theory explains; a law describes a pattern. A theory does not grow into a law.

Scientific explanations are tested and revised โ€” OpenStax College, Chemistry (CC BY archive). CC BY 3.0. Original source image reproduced unchanged; explanatory caption added.

2 / 4

Identify what changes and what responds

The independent variable is the factor the researcher changes. The dependent variable is the response measured. Controlled variables are kept the same.

In the plant example, light time is independent and plant height is dependent. Plant type, soil, water, pot size, and study length should stay the same. Changing several factors at once makes the cause unclear.

Operational definitions state exactly how variables are changed or measured. โ€œGrowthโ€ might mean change in height in centimeters over 14 days. This makes the test repeatable and prevents people from measuring different outcomes.

3 / 4

Samples, replication, and bias

A control group gives a comparison without the tested treatment. Random assignment helps spread hidden differences among groups. A larger, representative sample usually gives stronger evidence than a small biased sample.

Repeated trials show whether a result is consistent. Replication means other researchers can repeat the study. Blinding can reduce the effect of expectations on measurement.

Worked example. Divide similar plants randomly into no-fertilizer and fertilizer groups. Give all plants the same light, soil, water, and time. Measure height the same way. Several plants per group and repeated trials reduce the influence of chance.

Random sampling concerns who enters the sample and helps generalization; random assignment concerns which treatment sampled subjects receive and helps causal comparisons. Neither guarantees perfection. Repeated readings of one plant are not the same as independent replication with several plants.

4 / 4

Trust the right conclusion

Reliability means getting consistent results. Validity means the design truly tests the intended question. A tool can give very consistent but wrong readings, so reliability alone does not prove accuracy or validity.

A confounding variable changes with the independent variable and could explain the result. Good controls reduce confounding and support a cause-and-effect conclusion.

If a study changes fertilizer and water together, it cannot tell which change caused growth.

Terms to remember

hypothesis
A testable proposed explanation or prediction.
independent variable
The factor deliberately changed.
dependent variable
The result measured.
controlled variable
A factor kept the same.
control group
A comparison group without the tested treatment.
reliability
The ability to get consistent results.
validity
How well a study tests the intended question.

Your quick summary

  • A useful hypothesis is testable.
  • The independent variable is changed.
  • The dependent variable is measured.
  • Controls make comparison possible.
  • Replication improves reliability.
  • Validity asks whether the design tests the intended claim.

Lesson quiz

Check what you learned, then review the explanations. This quiz saves results on this device only. Sign in to save quiz results to your account.

All Science lessons

Lesson contents

Wait! Grab your free cheat sheet

Get the essential TEAS formulas, conversions, and must-know facts in one printable PDF.

๐Ÿ“‹ FREE: TEAS Quick Reference Cheat Sheet

โœ“ Check your inbox! Your cheat sheet is on its way.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.